Ethereum: Because public bag keys do not provide quantum resistance
The development of Ethereum 2.0 has been discussed about a safer and resistant cryptocurrency network, including the implementation of Taproot. The main aspect of the Taproot is how it controls public keys, which seems to be contrary to the thought that the bag does not give quantum resistance.
quantum cryptography: threat to public key to mix
During quantum calculation management, encryption is based on principles such as the distribution of the quantum key (QKD) and quantum encryption based on the principles of quantum mechanics. The QKD aspect is resistant to quantum bag functions that are resistant to attacks of harmful parts that may try to use quantum computers to break classic cryptographic systems.
Since public bag keys do not provide quantum resistance
In the traditional public key encryption, such as RSA encryption and elliptical curve, public key mixing does not give any resistance to quantum attacks. This is because the safety of these algorithms is based on hardness to consider large numbers or calculate discrete logarithms in cryptographic groups.
Taproot and its consequences for public key bags
The Taproot offer, a potential renewal of Ethereum, aims to introduce a new consent protocol that uses a different approach to guaranteeing transactions. Taproot will benefit the technique called “bag -time tests” tests (HTV), which allows the network nodes to check the integrity of the operations without relying on the classic cryptographic functions of the bag.
Public bag keys to Taproot: A possible solution?
An article published in the beginning of this year mentioned that the results would cover the public key directly with the bag. Although this is not a direct answer to the question of quantum resistance, it shows that Taproot could introduce a new paradigm to guarantee transactions.
Smirnov’s article suggested that the keys of the public’s bag could be replaced by other cryptographic methods such as tests with bag -time tests (HTVP). HTVPs are designed specifically for safe multi -categorical calculations and decentralized programs. These tests allow several parts to test the validity of the operation together without contacting the classic cryptographic functions of the bag.
Effect on quantum resistance
Although the mixing of public keys is not directly related to quantum resistance, it is very important to consider how Taproot could affect the safety of these long -term algorithms. If Taproot introduces new safer protocols to ensure operations, this can be made by some deficiencies in the traditional public key encryption.
Conclusion
In conclusion, public keys do not give a quantum resistance due to the internal nature of the classic cryptographic bag functions. However, as Taproot and other emerging technologies continue to develop, they may introduce new methods to ensure transactions that are not based on traditional bag methods.
Although we have not yet seen the implementation of a clear “taproot” or similar protocols that are highly resistant to quantum resistance, it is very important to consider the impact of these changes on our encryption and its potential restrictions in the face of emerging threats.
发表回复